Information Resources
HomeServicesLog InFAQAbout UsContact UsBecome A Client 

Criminal background checks: when & why ?

Criminal Search and the Employer’s expectations

Companies of every size, in every industry, in every state, share a common goal: to employ a quality workforce. And, although human resources departments have different ways of accomplishing this crucial goal, they use similar strategies. One strategy is to conduct criminal record checks on applicants prior to making an offer of employment.

When is a Criminal Check advisable?


In many cases, it is easy to see why a criminal check is advisable. A bank hires individuals who handle cash and other monetary transactions. Clearly, an individual cannot have a criminal past that includes convictions for theft, burglary, or embezzlement. The carpet installation company or pest control company sends individuals into people’s homes. Having a worker with a past history of assault could be a very costly mistake for a company that sends workers out to work with clients. The health care industry has a “higher duty of care,” and must be very careful in screening applicants. But what about the maintenance staff? The worker on the assembly line? The server in a restaurant? Is it really necessary to conduct a criminal check on everyone?

Employers conduct criminal record searches because their goal is to protect company assets. In a broad sense, company assets include not only inventory and equipment, but also customers, and staff. Does your maintenance staff have keys to your offices? Do your food servers interact with your customers? Are assembly workers expected to work cooperatively with fellow employees? What if the individual you hired had a sexual assault conviction in his past? When considering customers and staff, employers might want to know if their workers have convictions for crimes of a violent nature.

Your company’s written policy with respect to background checks

“If I screened out everyone with a criminal past, half my workers would be gone.”

You may be surprised to know that employers occasionally make comments like this. However, there are situations where this is the case. Companies hire individuals with criminal pasts as part of a rehabilitation program, for example. These workers have paid their debt to society; and the employer is offering a second chance. Are these employers mistaken? Is it fair to apply the same standards to all positions within a company? The answer to these questions is simply this: When it comes to hiring, each employer is unique. So, after assessing the situation, and considering the benefits and risks, an employer is better able to institute policies with respect to background checks for employment purposes.

A consistent policy protects the employer
The higher the position, the more employers want to know about the person’s past prior to extending an offer of employment. A typical policy for hiring a member of the executive team might include conducting a range of background checks, such as: criminal record search, employment verification, education verification, Social Security check, interviews with business references, and a civil court record search. The same company, when hiring drivers, might choose to perform a criminal record search, employment verification and driver’s license check.

The key is relevancy and consistency. So, once an employer determines what types of background checks are relevant for different categories of workers, it is important to conduct the same checks for all candidates who apply for positions within those categories. Where employers make mistakes is in background checking people with whom they are not familiar, while foregoing a background check for someone they know. Relevancy…consistency…and a written policy will protect employers from future litigation, while helping to ensure a higher quality workforce.

Return to Top